When Jesus died, his followers knew where his body had been placed. Joseph of Arimathea had laid it in a tomb. But what had happened to Jesus himself? And what did his coming mean for the generations who had already died?
Those questions bring us to an ancient Christian conviction that deserves more attention: Christ descended to the dead.
In our previous studies, we considered the condition of the righteous after death and their expectation of blessings still to come. Now we turn to the person at the center of that hope. What did Christians believe Jesus had done for those who were already beyond the reach of his earthly ministry?
The sources lead us through four questions. Did Christ truly enter the world of the dead? What did his coming mean for those awaiting him? What changed for them? And how far did that deliverance extend?
Along the way, we will hear teachers, poets, and storytellers. Each helps us understand ancient Christian belief, although they do not all provide the same kind of evidence. Their shared conviction is easier to identify than one shared explanation of every detail.
Christ’s saving work reached into death itself.
Did Christ Truly Enter the World of the Dead?
The New Testament starting point
In Acts, Peter explains the resurrection through Psalm 16. David had spoken of someone whom God would not abandon to Hades. Peter identifies that person as Jesus:
Brothers, I can speak openly to you about the patriarch David: he died and was buried, and his tomb remains among us today. Since he was a prophet and knew that God had sworn to place one of his descendants on his throne, he looked ahead and spoke about the Messiah’s resurrection: he was not abandoned to Hades, and his flesh did not undergo decay. God raised this Jesus, and we are all witnesses of it.
(Acts 2:29–32)
Hades here means the realm of the dead. The passage connects Christ’s release from death with his bodily resurrection. It does not yet describe a meeting between Jesus and other departed people.
For that, Christians turned especially to First Peter:
Christ also suffered for sins once, the righteous one for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit. In the spirit he also went and made proclamation to the spirits in prison, who had formerly disobeyed when God waited patiently in Noah’s days while the ark was being prepared. In it a few people, eight in all, were brought safely through water.
Corresponding to this, baptism now saves you through Jesus Christ’s resurrection. It is an appeal to God for a good conscience, rather than a washing of dirt from the body. Jesus has entered heaven and is at God’s right hand, with angels, authorities, and powers placed under him.
(1 Peter 3:18–22)
This passage identifies a proclamation to imprisoned spirits associated with Noah’s generation. It does not state the proclamation’s content or explicitly place it between Jesus’ burial and resurrection.
Christians have understood the spirits as departed human beings or as rebellious spiritual beings. Another interpretation sees Christ’s Spirit preaching through Noah to people who subsequently died. Many ancient writers understood the passage as a ministry among the departed, but their interpretation should remain distinguishable from the passage’s explicit statements.
The next chapter adds:
They will give an account to the one who stands ready to judge both living people and the dead. For this reason the good news was announced even to the dead, so that, although judged in the flesh as human beings are, they might live in the spirit according to God.
(1 Peter 4:5–6)
Here the message is explicitly good news. The sentence leaves open whether its recipients heard it after death or during lives that had since ended.
Ephesians supplied another important passage:
Therefore it says, “He ascended to the heights, took captives in his procession, and gave gifts to people.”
What does “he ascended” mean except that he also descended into the lower regions of the earth? The one who descended is also the one who ascended far above all the heavens, so that he might fill everything.
(Ephesians 4:8–10)
Several ancient Christians understood the lower regions as the realm of the dead. Another reading understands the phrase as the lower region that is the earth, describing Christ’s coming from heaven. The captives themselves are not identified.
These passages provided the foundation on which Christians reflected. Their conviction grew around the same central event: the crucified Jesus had been raised, and death had failed to hold him.
Justin: salvation announced to the departed
Around AD 155–160, Justin Martyr, a Christian teacher associated with Rome who originally came from Roman Palestine, quoted this saying:
The Lord God remembered his departed people Israel, lying in their graves, and went down to announce his salvation to them.
(Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho 72, c. AD 155–160)
Justin attributed the saying to Jeremiah. It does not occur in our surviving text of Jeremiah, and Justin’s allegation that it had been removed does not establish that this happened.
Its value for our question is straightforward: it shows that Justin knew and accepted a tradition of salvation being proclaimed to the departed. We should cite it as a saying preserved by Justin, rather than as an authenticated passage from Jeremiah.
Tertullian: Jesus accepted the condition of the dead
By c. AD 210, Tertullian was writing in Carthage, in Roman North Africa, now Tunisia. He grounded the descent in Christ’s real humanity:
Although Christ is God, he is also human. He died according to the Scriptures and was buried according to those same Scriptures. He fully accepted the law of his human condition by remaining in Hades in the condition of someone who had died. He did not ascend to heaven’s heights before descending to the earth’s lower regions, so that there he could bring the patriarchs and prophets into participation in himself.
(Tertullian, On the Soul 55, c. AD 210)
Tertullian sees Jesus sharing the experience of death and bringing his presence to those already there. His humanity reaches into the condition we fear, while his saving purpose extends to the people who preceded him.
He went where the dead were.
What Did His Coming Mean for Those Awaiting Him?
The prophets meet their teacher
Ignatius was bishop of Antioch in Roman Syria. Early in the second century, writing from Smyrna in Asia Minor to Christians in nearby Magnesia, he described the prophets’ relationship with Christ:
How could we live apart from him? Even the prophets were his disciples in the Spirit and waited for him as their teacher. Because of this, the one they rightly awaited came and raised them from the dead.
(Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Magnesians 9.2, c. AD 110)
The prophets already belonged to the one who was coming. Their earlier lives were part of his story, and their hope reached toward him.
Ignatius does not explain the mechanics of their raising. What he gives us is the relationship: disciples waiting for their teacher, and a teacher whose coming reaches them even in death.
The dead recognize their deliverer
The anonymous Odes of Solomon, commonly dated somewhere within the second century and often associated with Syria, express the hope through poetry. In the concluding ode, the speaker is understood here as Christ:
Sheol saw me and was distressed. Death released me, and many others with me. I experienced gall and bitterness and descended with him into his deepest depths. He released both head and feet, unable to endure my presence.
Among his dead I formed a living congregation, and I addressed them with living lips, because my word would not be fruitless.
Those who had died hurried toward me and cried, “Son of God, show us mercy and act toward us with kindness. Release us from darkness’s chains and open the door through which we may come to you. We see that our death has not overcome you. Let us share in your redemption, because you are our redeemer.”
I heard their cry and sealed my name upon their heads. They are free, and they belong to me. Hallelujah.
(Odes of Solomon 42, concluding passage, c. AD 100–200)
The poem pictures recognition, appeal, response, and belonging. Its vivid language expresses deliverance rather than supplying a geographical itinerary.
The king welcomes his heralds
By c. AD 350, Cyril of Jerusalem was teaching people preparing for Christian initiation in Roman Palestine. His description gives names to the gathering:
The holy prophets hurried toward him, together with Moses the lawgiver, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Samuel, Isaiah, and John the Baptist. All the righteous whom death had swallowed were redeemed. It was fitting that the king they had proclaimed should become the redeemer of his noble heralds.
Then each righteous person said, “Death, where is your victory? Grave, where is your sting? The conqueror has redeemed us.”
(Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures 14.19, c. AD 350)
Cyril is a later witness, describing the event more fully than Ignatius. Yet the relationship is recognizable: those who proclaimed Christ are received by Christ.
Across these accounts, the earlier righteous remain people with a future. Their earthly lives have ended, but their relationship with God has not.
What Changed for Them?
The writers describe forgiveness, incorporation into Christ’s people, release from death’s power, and, in some accounts, movement into a higher rest. Those claims overlap, but they are not interchangeable.
Hermas: one church across the generations
In second-century Rome, the Shepherd of Hermas pictured the church as a tower built from people represented by stones. Some stones stand for righteous people who died before receiving the Christian proclamation.
The vision explains how they enter:
These apostles and teachers who proclaimed the Son of God’s name, after falling asleep in the Son of God’s power and faith, proclaimed it also to those who had fallen asleep and gave them the seal of the proclamation.
They therefore went down into the water with them and came up again. The apostles and teachers went down alive and came up alive, while those who had previously fallen asleep went down dead and came up alive. Through them they received life and learned the Son of God’s name. Therefore they came up together and were fitted together into the tower, being built into it without needing to be cut. They had fallen asleep in righteousness and great purity, but lacked this seal.
(Hermas, The Shepherd, Similitude 9.16.5–7, c. AD 140–150)
The seal is baptism. Here departed apostles minister to earlier righteous people. The vision’s result is one church built from both groups.
From the rest below to the rest above
The Epistula Apostolorum, or Epistle of the Apostles, is an anonymous second-century Christian work presented in the apostles’ collective voice. Its origin is uncertain, with Egypt and Asia Minor among the proposed settings.
It places this explanation in Jesus’ mouth:
For this purpose I went down to Lazarus’s place and proclaimed the message to the righteous and the prophets, so that they might leave the rest below and enter the rest above. With my right hand I poured over them the water of life, forgiveness, and deliverance from every evil, just as I have done for you and for those who believe in me.
But if someone believes in me and does not keep my commandments, confessing my name brings that person no benefit. Such a person runs without purpose and will encounter destruction, having disregarded my commandments.
(Epistula Apostolorum 27, c. AD 140–170)
This literary presentation of Jesus’ teaching describes a transition between two conditions of rest. The Ethiopic version explicitly uses baptismal language.
It also joins hope with responsibility: confessing Christ carries a commitment to obey him. The passage describes a particular advance in blessing, rather than establishing an endless sequence of advances.
Irenaeus: the same forgiveness that reaches us
Around AD 180, Irenaeus was writing in Lyons, in Roman Gaul, now France. His background also connected him to Asia Minor.
He explained Christ’s descent this way:
For this reason the Lord also descended to the regions beneath the earth. There too he announced his coming and the forgiveness of sins for those who believe in him. Those who had placed their hope in him believed: those who had announced his coming and followed God’s arrangements, the righteous, the prophets, and the patriarchs. He forgave their sins just as he forgives ours. We should not hold those sins against them, unless we intend to despise God’s grace.
(Irenaeus, Against Heresies 4.27.2, c. AD 180)
Earlier believers receive forgiveness through the same Christ who forgives us. Irenaeus makes this a reason for humility in how we speak about them.
He then places the generations within a single purpose:
Christ did not come only for those who believed in him during the time of Tiberius Caesar. Nor did the Father exercise his care only for people who are alive now. He did so for all people who, from the beginning, according to their ability and in their own generation, feared and loved God, practiced justice and devotion toward their neighbors, and earnestly desired to see Christ and hear his voice.
At his second coming he will therefore first awaken people of this kind from their sleep. He will raise them, together with the others who are to be judged, and give them a place in his kingdom.
For the same God guided the patriarchs in his purposes and justified the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith. Just as we were foreshadowed in them, they are represented in us, that is, in the church, and receive the reward for what they did.
(Irenaeus, Against Heresies 4.22.2, c. AD 180)
His account embraces both those who came before Jesus and those who follow him now.
Hippolytus: death loses its power
A work associated with Hippolytus, traditionally connected with Rome, explains Christ’s authority in every realm:
He is Lord of what is in heaven, because he was begotten as God’s Word before all ages; of what is on earth, because he became human among us to recreate our Adam through himself; and of what is beneath the earth, because he was counted among the dead, announcing the good news to the souls of the saints and conquering death through death.
(Hippolytus, On Christ and Antichrist 26, c. AD 200)
The same work extends John the Baptist’s role into Hades:
After Herod put him to death, he also preached first to those in Hades, becoming a forerunner there, so that there too he might announce that the Savior would descend to redeem the souls of the saints from death’s power.
(Hippolytus, On Christ and Antichrist 45, c. AD 200)
John’s activity is an additional tradition beyond the New Testament account. It illustrates how Christians developed the story around Christ’s victory.
Deliverance could coexist with waiting
Did these writers therefore believe that the intermediate state had ended?
Irenaeus still expected the disciples to await bodily resurrection:
The Lord went into death’s shadow, where the souls of the dead were. Afterward he rose bodily and, following his resurrection, was taken up. It is therefore clear that the souls of his disciples, for whose sake he underwent these things, will also go to the unseen place God has assigned them. They remain there awaiting the resurrection. Then they receive their bodies and rise as complete people, bodily, just as the Lord rose, and thus enter God’s presence.
For a disciple does not stand above the teacher, but everyone fully prepared will be like the teacher. Our teacher awaited the resurrection time appointed by the Father, as Jonah’s story had foreshadowed, and after rising on the third day was taken up. We too should await the resurrection time God has appointed and the prophets foretold. Then, having risen, those whom the Lord judges worthy will be taken up.
(Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.31.2, c. AD 180)
The blessing of the departed and the restoration of the whole person are distinguishable.
Tertullian likewise disputed Christians who thought Christ’s descent meant believers would no longer enter Hades. He generally retained a waiting place while giving martyrs a special privilege. These differences prevent us from assigning every writer an identical account of where the righteous went.
For our own understanding, the distinction matters. Christ’s people can receive blessing and belong securely to him while still awaiting a further transformation. Resurrection restores embodied human life. Its place in the story need not imply that every blessing has already been experienced beforehand.
How Far Did That Deliverance Extend?
Once Christians affirmed Christ’s ministry among the dead, another question followed. Did it concern only the righteous of Israel? Could others respond? Was everyone released?
Here the differences become more pronounced.
Clement: what about people outside Israel?
Around AD 200, Clement of Alexandria in Egypt reasoned through the possibilities:
In my judgment, the Savior also exercises his power because saving is his work. He did this by drawing to salvation those who, wherever they were, became willing through the proclamation to believe in him.
If the Lord descended to Hades to proclaim the good news, as indeed he did, he proclaimed it either to everyone or only to the Hebrews. If to everyone, then all who believe will be saved, even if they are Gentiles, when they make their confession there. For God’s punishments aim at salvation and correction, leading toward conversion; he desires the sinner’s repentance rather than death.
(Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 6.6, c. AD 200)
Clement explicitly considers belief and salvation after death. His wider discussion also assigns a ministry to departed apostles. This is his argument about divine justice and saving purpose, rather than a position every ancient Christian shared.
Origen: an ancient critic challenges the claim
By c. AD 248, Origen, originally from Alexandria and then working in Caesarea in Roman Palestine, was answering the pagan critic Celsus. Celsus had written around AD 175–180.
Origen preserves the objection and responds:
Celsus next says to us: “Surely you will not claim that, after failing to persuade people in this world, he went to Hades to persuade the people there?”
Whether Celsus likes it or not, we maintain that Jesus, while in the body, won over a great many people, so many that a conspiracy arose against him because of the number of his followers. We also maintain that, when his soul was separated from its bodily covering, he lived among souls likewise without bodies. He brought to himself those willing to turn to him, or those whom he knew, for reasons known to him alone, to be more suited to this.
(Origen, Against Celsus 2.43, c. AD 248)
The criticism indicates that the belief was already attracting objections in the second century. Origen defends Christ’s active ministry among departed souls, including their response to him.
Gregory: a question still being asked
Writing in fourth-century Cappadocia, in Asia Minor, Gregory of Nazianzus invited his hearers to contemplate the same issue:
If he goes down to Hades, go down with him. Learn Christ’s mysteries there too: what purpose governs this twofold descent? Does his appearing save everyone without exception, or does it save there also those who believe?
(Gregory of Nazianzus, Oration 45.24, c. AD 383)
Gregory gives us a question rather than an explicit resolution. His words show that affirming the descent did not automatically settle the scope of its effects.
Augustine: confidence and restraint
In AD 414, Augustine, bishop of Hippo Regius in North Africa, now Algeria, distinguished his confidence in Christ’s descent from his uncertainty about precisely whom Christ delivered:
But it would be presumptuous for us to determine who these people were. If we say that everyone found there was delivered without exception, who would not rejoice if we could establish it?
(Augustine, Letter 164.2.4, AD 414)
He also asked why First Peter singled out Noah’s generation if it meant that Jesus preached to the dead after the crucifixion. Why mention those people rather than the countless others who had died?
Augustine’s questions help us state the historical conclusion accurately. The descent was widely affirmed. Its recipients, effects, and relationship to particular biblical passages remained subjects of interpretation.
We can recognize the breadth of the shared belief without pretending the details were settled.
How Christians Told the Story
Alongside these theological discussions, Christians expressed the descent through narratives. Those accounts reveal how believers pictured the event, but their dramatic details require a different assessment from a biblical statement or an argument about its meaning.
A voice at the resurrection
The second-century Gospel of Peter, an anonymous work written under Peter’s name, includes an extraordinary resurrection scene. Figures emerge from the tomb, followed by a cross:
A voice from heaven was heard: “Have you proclaimed the message to those who sleep?” An answer came from the cross: “Yes.”
(Gospel of Peter 10.41–42, second century)
Its precise origin is uncertain, although a gospel bearing Peter’s name was known in the Syrian region by around AD 200. The speaking cross belongs to the narrative itself.
For our purposes, the passage shows proclamation to the dead woven into a resurrection story. It offers no clear identification of those who heard or of what happened to them.
Christ takes Adam by the hand
The later Gospel of Nicodemus develops the scene much further. It is a composite work with several versions; its descent narrative is commonly associated with fifth- or sixth-century development. Its author and precise origin are unknown.
In one Latin version, Christ addresses the righteous:
The Lord extended his hand and said, “Come to me, all my holy ones who bear my image and likeness. You were condemned through the tree, the devil, and death; now see the devil and death condemned through the tree.”
Immediately the saints gathered together under the Lord’s hand. Taking Adam by his right hand, the Lord said, “Peace to you and to all your children who are my righteous ones.”
(Gospel of Nicodemus, Descent, Latin A 8.1; also numbered 24.1)
The story later brings them into paradise under Michael’s guidance. Its conversations and staging dramatize deliverance. They should not be treated as independently verified information from the first century.
The image, however, expresses the theology memorably: Christ reaches for humanity’s first ancestor and leads him toward life.
What About the Saints Raised in Matthew?
Matthew’s account belongs to the New Testament evidence itself:
Jesus cried out loudly again and gave up his spirit. At that moment the temple curtain split in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, rocks split apart, and tombs opened. Many bodies of holy people who had fallen asleep were raised. After Jesus’ resurrection they came out of the tombs, entered the holy city, and appeared to many people.
(Matthew 27:50–53)
Matthew connects the opening tombs with Jesus’ death and places the saints’ emergence and appearance after his resurrection. Their names, subsequent lives, and ultimate destination remain unstated.
This helps explain why Christians could speak of Christ’s victory reaching people who had already died. Cyril explicitly connects the descent with this passage.
But Matthew does not identify these saints as every righteous person in Hades or say that they ascended with Jesus. His account presents a sign of death losing its hold, while leaving many of our questions unanswered.
We should allow the sign to speak with its full force without supplying the missing biographies ourselves.
Why Does the Apostles’ Creed Say “He Descended into Hell”?
Many Christians encounter this teaching through the Apostles’ Creed. Its traditional English wording can confuse readers because “hell” often suggests final punishment, whereas the descent tradition concerns Christ entering the realm of the dead.
“He descended to the dead” expresses that distinction clearly.
The creed developed through baptismal confessions and has no identifiable single author. Its familiar wording accumulated over time. Around AD 404, Rufinus of Aquileia in northern Italy observed:
The clause “He descended into hell” does not appear in the Roman church’s creed or in those of the Eastern churches. Its meaning, however, seems to be included in the statement that he was buried.
(Rufinus, Commentary on the Apostles’ Creed 18, c. AD 404)
Rufinus also illustrated the descent:
Imagine a king entering a prison, opening its doors, undoing its restraints, breaking its chains and bars, and leading the prisoners into freedom. He restores those who sit in darkness and death’s shadow to light and life.
(Rufinus, Commentary on the Apostles’ Creed 17, c. AD 404)
The belief therefore preceded the clause’s widespread inclusion in creeds. The king enters to liberate.
The Victory They Celebrated
To hear the joy behind these discussions, we can return to second-century Asia Minor. Melito, bishop of Sardis, celebrated Christ’s victory in his Easter homily:
“I am the one who destroys death, and triumphs over the enemy, and crushes Hades.”
(Melito of Sardis, On Pascha 100, c. AD 160–170)
Melito’s concluding proclamation presents Christ as humanity’s liberator, life, resurrection, and king. The risen Christ summons people to forgiveness and promises to bring them to the Father.
This is the conviction that gives the descent its place within Christian hope. The one who died has overcome death, and his victory concerns others as well as himself.
The sources we have read differ in important ways. Some emphasize the earlier righteous. Some consider a wider opportunity to respond. Some describe continuing rest and expectation; others describe movement into a higher rest or paradise.
Across those differences, Christ remains the center.
Why This Matters for Us
These writings carry us across Rome, Gaul, Egypt, North Africa, Palestine, and Asia Minor, with additional texts often associated with Syria. They show a belief expressed through letters, visions, poetry, sermons, theological arguments, and narratives.
That geographical breadth demonstrates how widely Christians considered Christ’s relation to the dead. It does not turn every writer into an independent witness to an event in Hades. They shared Scriptures, inherited traditions, and sometimes drew on one another.
For a critic, the distinction matters. These sources establish what Christians believed and how they understood the implications of Christ’s resurrection. They do not provide direct observation of the unseen world. The foundational question remains the one around which this series has been built: what reasons do we have to believe that God raised Jesus?
For Christians, the descent brings depth to our confession of his real humanity and saving power. He entered the condition we will enter. Those who died before his earthly ministry remained within his concern.
It also broadens our understanding of the church. Ignatius calls the prophets Christ’s disciples. Hermas pictures earlier and later believers built into the same tower. Irenaeus places the generations within one saving purpose.
We should recognize the implications for our life together. People who confess the same Lord and share the same hope of resurrection have strong reasons to practice patience, unity, and charity. Our unresolved questions should not obscure the person around whom we gather.
Nor should our interest in the afterlife distract us from the lives entrusted to our care now. The dying, the grieving, the isolated, and the forgotten need our presence. Hope in Christ should make us more willing to move toward them.
Revelation gives the risen Jesus the final word:
Do not fear. I am the first and the last, the living one. I died, but now I live for all eternity, and the keys of death and Hades belong to me.
(Revelation 1:17–18)
We do not possess a complete account of every experience awaiting us. These ancient writers did not possess one uniform account either. What they proclaimed was a Savior whose authority extended into the realm they had not yet entered.
That is why the Christian can look forward with hope. Rest can still hold promise. Blessing can still open toward further blessing. Resurrection restores the whole person, and our future belongs to the one who has overcome death.
Christ has gone before us. Death cannot place us beyond his reach.
Discover more from Living the Bible
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
